|
Taken from Wikipedia
Panarchism is a political philosophy advocating the peaceful co-existence of all political systems, where each individual may voluntarily adhere to the system of their choice, free to join and leave the jurisdiction of the governments he sees fit. International law would be used to settle possible conflicts between individuals having chosen different systems of government.
The word panarchy was invented and the concept proposed by a Belgian political scientist, Paul Émile de Puydt in 1860. He argued for panarchy as a replacement for "wasteful revolutions".
In modern times, some have argued that panarchism is an alternative
way of presenting the same system as the one advocated by forms of anarchism.
The most common criticism of panarchism is that the concept is
self-contradictory, because certain political systems reject peaceful
co-existence. This criticism can be answered by placing a single
restriction on the political systems who can participate in panarchy:
that they must accept the basic principle of panarchy itself.
A world or region with a large number of micronations
could provide the best embodiment of panarchy. Starting a nation has
traditionally been very difficult because all land is claimed by
existing nations, but seasteading
may lower the barrier of entry for would-be founders of new
micronations. Seasteading would also make immigration cheaper and
easier (seasteads being analogous to mobile homes).
"PANARCHISM provides the only
framework that could, at the same time and in the same country, satisfy
the RIGHTFUL aspirations of all kinds of statists as well as of all
kinds of freedom lovers. Since the radical freedom lovers are almost
everywhere a small minority and have little chance, in the short run,
to convert all the statists to their point of view, they should be the
first ones to adopt this program. However, they find it very difficult
to do, since they are, like most statists, stuck on the territorial
model, which excludes tolerance for exterritorially autonomous
volunteer communities. It is also the cornerstone for any rightful and
efficient peace, defence, revolution and liberation effort, since it
could turn most of the resources of any dictatorial or totalitarian
regime against it and could do so without driving the regime into a
corner, ready to undertake mass murderous steps. Even the worst regime
has some voluntary followers and under panarchism it could retain
these, as long as it satisfied them. I know of no better program to
defuse and finally abolish the threat posed by ABC mass murder devices
combined with popular notions on collective responsibility and enemies,
all tied to the territorial model."
John Zube
|